Sentence Patterns
The distinction between
content (or lexical) words and function (or structural) words is maintained by
most structural linguists. Lexical words express primarily lexical (or content)
meaning and function words convey primarily grammatical meaning, though the distinction
between the two of meaning is not always clear-cut.
The soldier polishes his shoes
Our teacher preaper many exercises
That driver registers three trucks
A mother inspects the ward
The
four sentences above refer to quite different people and situation. In other words, they differ in lexical
meaning. However, they have the same grammatical meaning in that the first word
is determine, the second a noun, the third a verb, the fourth a determiner and
the fifth a noun. That is, each sentence is made up of the same sequence word
classes.
Det. Noun verb det Noun
The
grammatical meaning shared by the sentences is the grammatical pattern or syntactical arrangement. The linguist
tries to find out what the syntactical arrangements in his corpus are by listing
them.
The man shot the bulgar
Det. Noun verb det. Noun
Dewi wore a frilly dress to the party
Noun verb det. Adj. noun prep. Det. Noun
A sick woman called the doctor
Det. Adj. noun verb det. Noun
Professional singers take special food
Adj noun verb adj. noun
After many such
listings, the linguist may conclude that the underlying grammatical pattern to
all the sentences is :
Noun verb noun
One procedure of
structural linguists, therefore, is to compare similar patterns and search for
the common underlying arrangements.Another procedur is similar to that used in
analysis, phonemes and morphemes. The linguist looks for recurring patterns
with animal differences:
You can sharpen the pencil. Can you sharpen the pencil?
John will wash my car will john wash my car?
Ali may see the picture may ali see the picture?
The above pairs of sentences are
differentiated from each other by moving the auxiliary to the front of the
sentence and by the change in intonation pattern. From this kind of analysis, the
linguist gets his idea about the question pattern in English.
1.
Constituent
Analysis
The linguist is interested not only in the sentence pasterns, which
really represent the sequence of sentence elements (determiner, noun, verb,
etc), but also in the relationship between the elements. Which elements are
more closely related to each other than the other elements? In the sentence, the
hunter shot the tiger, which of the following ways of grouping the elements
(words) is acceptable to a native speaker?
a) The/
hunter shot the tiger.
b) The
hunter/ shot the tiger
c)
The hunter shot/ the tiger
d)
The hunter shot the/ tiger
A
native speaker would intutitively say that the second grouping gives the two
main part of the sentence, i.e. the parts that make up the sentence “immediately”.
(parts that immediately make up larger parts of a sentence are called immediate
constituents. The immediate constituents of the above sentence are the hunter
and shot the tiger). The linguist can continue the process of dividing the
sentence parts in order to find the groupings acceptable to a native speaker.
For example, shot the tiger is divided into the immediate constituents shot and
the tiger. This process can be continued until only individual words are left.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar